In fact, all EU sellers that deal in parts are breaking the law regards CE. By repackaging the original product without Lego's explicit authority, EU law considers that the seller takes over responsibility for certification, in essence they become the manufacturer. Unless each seller certifies that what they're selling is compliant, they are technically breaking the law when supplying parts to consumers. It's not compliant to just lump a CE sticker on, or claim that Lego have already certified them so you don't need to.
I still find it odd that LEGO's own inventory lists frequently are missing (sometimes) random pieces. It appears that when a piece is retired (or replaced with another similar piece) the old number disappears from the inventory. One would think it simple to take the parts list from the instruction manual, and that becomes the static parts list. No need to modify or adjust if parts come and go, but then add new 'replacement' parts when parts retire.
This is a common flaw in poorly written inventory management systems. Items that are no longer produced/stocked get dropped from the catalog entirely, causing exactly this sort of problem. A better approach is to have a flag in the item master file indicating that the item is active or inactive, so the item can be excluded from being sold while still being available for historical purposes.
I think this is partly because of the way BL works. Someone takes the inventory role for a particular set/figure and nobody else can do it. They then have to get the parts submitted and approved, then the inventory approved. The minifigure is currently in the same state.
Although I doubt it has had much impact on sales. The minifigure and the set was added 6 Dec, so about at release date. Remember that BL do not allow items to be listed before their official release, to stop the trade in stolen items or other leaked parts.
I don't believe that there has been any change in personnel or location, so this is probably down to BL rather than LEGO. BL has been very flaky for the past few months. There are times it works, and times it doesn't. The types of errors have changed recently too.
Because LEGO said there wouldn't be immediate changes? Because more Lego fans might need clarity? Because as a Lego news site that is a big deal (they cover magazines related to our hobby and not the main second hand site)?
As @CCC said above—Brickset have posted about the takeover already, updated TOS are relatively minor in comparison to the original news. Brickset doesn't generally post tabloid-style news articles, which is effectively what "Lego changed the T&Cs when they said they wouldn't" is.
This is an awesome car, with fun, and very technical details. However, this set is best suited for an advanced builder. It will be frustrating for a new builder. I have a bright child with a fairly technical mind. He likes legos, so I thought this would be ideal for him. He found the task overwhelming. Another of my children is taking on the task of finishing the car. But I would advise you to have a dedicated work station and plenty of patience. This is not a toy for a casual builder.
If you want to know more details I would definitely recommend checking it out Lego Lepin
FreeVideosDownloader.net provides its users with an opportunity to download HD videos from various online platforms (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram). Today, users don't have to spend time watching their favorite online videos because they can save them to their device for watching at any time without internet access.
Donald replied
277 weeks ago